HSC Speeches Essay Essay Example for Free

HSC Speeches Essay EssayGreat speeches do not merely address a contextual economic consumption they also touch the harkts and minds of those who hear them. Evaluate to what extent the statement above supports your sympathizeing of the speeches set for study in Module B scathing Study of Texts. Words in their most basic forms ar just unintelligible sounds. Yet with the combination of feeling and verve, only then do they flex gistful. Words which not only combine emotions but also contextual misunderstandings and inequity are a recipe for the invoking of spirit. Words are the key to communication, a commonplaceness throughout each culture, nation and religion. Though the sounds they create are different, the true intertwined emotion and feeling behind these words weave a tapis of both globular disunion and union. Words are not restricted to a language or a sound, they are infinite in there meaning and purpose. Nevertheless this doesnt change what it invokes in the people who either hear or read it.Rather it inspires them. Contrary the popular belief, feminism is a send-off world idea. Margaret Atwood, a lifelong feminist, born in Canada, a country who gives females the same opportunities as men, is the epitome of a first world woman. It almost appears she is the antithesis of her global sister Aung Sun Suu Kyi. A woman, born in Burma, raised by political activists and placed under house arrest for 6 years for her movements towards equity. The grandeur of their upbringing though makes a resounding impact upon the audience, since their points are undistinguishable. Though they may be in different stages, the end goals are one. This display of haleness spanning across nations, cultures and time creates a timeless foundation for the solidarity of women.The power of a nation and society on any individual no event the sexual practice has insurmountable influence upon the youth. Atwoods Spotty Handed Villainesses is a speech written to inspire women that its okay not to be good totally the time. Why should women be depicted as one dimensional characters, why is there a seemingly an innate fear amongst authors to give a female character a legitimate personality, flaws and all? She encourages readers to look past stereotypes by addressing their almost inbred mental fears. For the bad behaviour of women abide no shades of grey. It is black and it is white and the lines are clearly drawn. Lest we forget when a women was good she was very good and when she was bad she was horrid. This tenor is also present within Suu Kyis speech Keynote Address at the Beijing World Conference on Women, the notion of women constantlyhaving to justify their own existence. These stereotypes, nursed into infants until their adulthood reflects this symbolism awakens a sense of epiphany within the audience.The traditional belief that the patriarchal paradigm is the reason for life and the justification of living, with the instilled belief that the daw n rises only when the rooster crows. Atwood Suu Kyis words strike us, for they have found our commonality, our youth. The commonality of folk tales, which were supposedly told to enforce morals and values to us, instead enforced boundaries. These boundaries which we were too young to understand or even acknowledge solidified the link between us. These boundaries hinder the true identity of women and their position in society, For isnt the sole idea, a commonality between all women? The contextual purpose is addressing the notion of why women cannot monopolise the true traits of men for they are men and men alones traits. Yet to give these identical traits to a woman, spells her immediate hastiness. Why cannot women stand on their own two god given feet, and be recognised without representing the traits of their male counterparts.This lone concept is the link, which encourages a movement within the hearts and minds of the readers, the movement to not become a stereotype. Though bot h speeches address the commonality of inequity, their words emanate and establish an emotion and bond meant to reach inside an individual and shock them. Their meaning rises above the words they choose to address the concept thus manifesting in the readers psyche. The truth of the matter is that we are all spotted. Like the wicked lady Macbeth, though these spots cannot be seen, they are indelible. They shall never be removed, yet though they are there it doesnt mean they should be given the power to determine a life. To be spotted isnt bad to be spotted is be real, and this stigma around female characters, that they are somehow more realistic than real women, the readers, is a detrimental mistake.These very stereotypes are found in every(prenominal) novel, article and song we either read or listen to. Whether knowingly or not women have been subordinated in their source of comfort, at their most vulnerable. Women have no sole protector, they are on their own and its time for them to recognise this and stand up for themselves, no matter their circumstance. Society is the downfall of equity and an encumbrance to the rise of feminism across the globe. These are the strength of Atwoods and Suu Kyis words. These are the words thatinspire and touch the minds and hearts of those who hear them. They have grasped a contextual issue faced in both countries female inequity, and created a movement amongst complete strangers across the globe. They have done this though creating a bond with the readers by their words. They are meant to be personified and expanded. This is why they earned the title of being a great speech.